Gypsum industry news

US: The American Coal Ash Association (ACAA) has criticised a proposed revision of coal ash regulations by the Environmental Protection Agency because it will restrict the recycling of coal ash.

"EPA's proposals related to the definition of coal ash beneficial use are the opposite of a regulatory roll-back," said Thomas H Adams, ACAA Executive Director ahead of a hearing with the EPA. "Without any damage cases or scientific analysis to justify its actions, the agency is seeking to impose burdensome new restrictions that will cause millions more tons of material to be disposed rather than be used in ways that safely conserve natural resources and energy."

Adams and the ACCA argue that previous EPA rules concluded that beneficial use of coal ash should be exempt from regulation and encouraged to contribute to sustainability. However, the ACCA has taken exception with a 2015 definition of beneficial use, which was intended to prevent ‘disposal activities masquerading as beneficial use.’ By expanding the scope of this definition the ACCA says that more coal ash will be landfilled instead of being recycled.

Coal is the fuel source for approximately one-third of electricity generation in the US and produces large volumes of solid coal combustion products - primarily ash and synthetic gypsum from emissions control devices. This family of diverse products is referred to as coal combustion residuals in a disposal setting and is often generically referred to as ‘coal ash.’

According to ACAA's most recent ‘Production and Use Survey,’ 64.4% of the coal ash produced during 2017 was recycled. By volume, 71.8Mt of coal combustion products were beneficially used in 2017 out of 111Mt that were produced. Coal ash production volume increased by 4% year-on-year from 2016.

US: According to Charlotte Business Journal, Duke Energy has proposed excavating 12 more of its 36 coal ash ponds in North and South Carolina and burying the waste in a fully-lined landfills or structural fill projects.

To date, Duke has proposed closure plans for 24 of the 36 ash ponds. In every case, it has proposed excavation and reburial. However, Garry Miller, head of closure engineering for Duke, said that might not be the case for the remaining 12 ponds. He said that the engineering work that remains to be done at those plants could yet show that a 'cap in place' process, which critics have said would be insufficient to protect against further contamination of groundwater, can effectively close them.

Miller said that none of the waste ash from Duke's 36 ash ponds would undergo beneficial reuse, the process of using the ash for commercial products such as a replacement for Portland cement in concrete and gypsum board. However, he added that Duke does send a portion of the dry ash it is currently producing at its largest plants for reuse. However, the time constraints imposed by North Carolina's Coal Ash Management Act of 2014 make it impossible for the existing ash ponds. "As we close these basins, the quantity in them is such that the market cannot handle it in a timely manner," said Miller.

Duke's current cost estimate for closing the ponds is US$3.4bn, although this is subject to revision.