Gypsum industry news

New Zealand: Fletcher Building has reported that its net profit rose by 51% year-on-year to US$114m in the half year that ended on 31 December 2015 from US$75.6m in the same period in 2014. Its sales rose by 2.5% to US$2.94bn from US$2.87bn. It attributed this to growth in its building products and distribution businesses making up for weaker earnings from Formica and New Zealand housing developments.

Fletcher Building reported that gypsum wallboard volumes via its Building Products division rose by 9% in the half year. Volumes of performance board rose by 12%. Sales volumes of insulation rose by 12% in New Zealand and 9% in Australia. It noted that its market share has also improved in both insulation markets due to competitive pricing following the strengthening of the US Dollar.

Australasia: LafargeHolcim has said that, despite what has been reported recently in the media, its Australian and New Zealand operations are not for sale.

LafargeHolcim recently announced a plan to divest almost US$5bn of assets in 2016 after posting unexpectedly weak third-quarter results. Speculation had emerged that it might exit from the Australasia region.

However, according to local media, an internal email sent to staff on 30 November 2015, Holcim Australia Chief Executive Mark Campbell said the company was 'not currently being sold,' but could not rule out an exit in the long term.

"I have checked whether the LafargeHolcim group had made a decision to sell the businesses in Australia and New Zealand and started a sale process without my knowledge and the answer I have received is 'no,'" said Campbell. "That said, organisations change focus over time and it is impossible to say that we will always be part of the LafargeHolcim group."

Australian-listed rivals, including Boral, Fletcher Building and Adelaide Brighton, are seen as potential acquirers, should the multinational giant choose to sell off its local arm. Ireland's CRH may also be interested. However, Morgan Stanley said that many of LafargeHolcim's local competitors might run into competition issues, given that the market is concentrated among several large players. "Should Adelaide Brighton fully participate, we cannot rule out that the 50% share in Cement Australia would be divested due to Australian regulations, given Adelaide Brighton's already strong share in cement," said Morgan Stanley Analyst James Rutledge. "While we think Fletcher Building is unlikely to be in a position to participate in industry consolidation, a change in owner that was less integrated into the region may be a positive for Fletcher Building at the margin," said Rutledge. "Given Boral's strong share in aggregates and the concrete market, we believe it will be difficult to participate in industry consolidation."

While Lafarge has a limited local presence in Australia and New Zealand, Holcim bought a string of Australian assets from Mexico's Cemex in 2009 for US$2bn and now boasts more than 350 sites nationwide.

New Zealand: The Commerce Commission has completed its investigation into allegations that Winstone Wallboards Limited, a subsidiary of Fletcher Building, acted anti-competitively to maintain its market position in the manufacture and supply of wallboard. Based on the evidence gathered during the investigation, the Commission does not believe that Winstone has breached the Commerce Act 1986 and it will not be taking any further action.

"We have completed a thorough investigation and there is no evidence to suggest that Winstone has breached the Commerce Act in any of these areas," said Commission Chairman Mark Berry.

The Commission's investigation was centred on three areas: Winstone's alleged exclusive agreements with merchants, the rebates Winstone pays to merchants and Winstone's alleged practice of undercutting other wallboard suppliers on jobs. The initial investigation was completed in April 2014 and followed by additional interviews and further investigation.

New Zealand: Building supply merchants are reluctant to stock products of Winstone Wallboards' rivals and are squeezing alternative goods, claimed the chief of a competing business who supplied documents to New Zealand's Commerce Commission (CC).

Kevin van Hest, managing director of Elephant Plasterboard, which has only 3% of the market share in New Zealand, said that suppliers were shy about stocking or selling alternatives to Winstone's Gib because they had strong financial reasons not to. Van Hest claimed that the reasons include personal rewards like invitations to sporting and other events, overseas trips and financial payments.

The Commission announced in September 2013 that it was looking into the allegation, which remains to be concluded. Rick Osborne of Winestone Wallboard's parent company Fletcher Building said at the time that his business was advised that the CC intended to inquire into its wallboard supply arrangements with building supplies merchants. "The company will fully cooperate with the Commerce Commission and is confident that its supply arrangements comply with the Commerce Act," Osborne said.

A spokesman for Fletcher Building said that the system in operation actively rewards those building supply merchants who sold Winstone board, but there was nothing wrong with the deal. "Rebate structures are prevalent in most industries and in reality amount to price competition, with supply terms being based on volume and the duration of contractual relationships," he said. "Fletcher Building is confident that its arrangements are not anti-competitive and do not breach the Commerce Act. In that regard we aim to prevent any potential anti-competitive conduct through our internal compliance programmes," said Fletcher Building's spokesman.

David Thomas, Winstone's general manager, said that the business has a 94% market share because it manufactured and delivered the best product to customers. "People do have other options and they have for the last 20 years,'' Thomas said, citing Elephant wallboard and other products including Chinese board. But van Hest said that a combination of incentives and commercial pressure on merchants meant he couldn't get any more than 3% of the wallboard market, despite being in business since the 1980s.

Lack of competition and arrangements with merchants was one of the big factors forcing New Zealanders to pay 70% more for wallboard than Australians, which increases house-building costs by 40% compared to Australia. Big chains will sell Elephant wallboard, but not necessarily from their shop floors, van Hest said. Instead, if they sold it at all, they took a builder's order and arranged delivery from van Hest's Glendene warehouse to the construction site. Very few big chains would stock Elephant board. "Stores are reluctant to trade too much in Elephant wallboard because of the financial and other incentives," said van Hest.

New Zealand: Fletcher Building, which holds a 94% share of the New Zealand wallboard market, may be hurt by a Budget decision to remove tariffs on imported wallboard and duties on other building products, according to analysts. Building products provide about 20% of Fletcher's earnings.

The government said that it hoped to reduce the cost of a standard new home by US$3500, by temporarily dropping duties on 90% of the building materials used. The cost of building materials in New Zealand is around 30% higher than in Australia.

The Building Industry Federation's chief executive Bruce Kohn doubted the Government's claim that the move would save new-home builders US$3500 and said that similar moves in Australia saw that market 'flooded' with low-quality building materials.

Finance Minister Bill English said that reducing the tariffs would build on the government's previous reforms to deliver more competition to the building materials industry. However, Labour leader David Cunliffe said, "Average prices in Auckland rose by US$6208 in April 2014. The Government's levy changes will save just two to three weeks of Auckland house-price inflation."

The Budget announced that anti-dumping tariffs on wallboard, reinforcing steel bar and wire nails would be immediately suspended for three years and tariffs on other materials such as roofing, cladding, insulation and paint would be dropped from 1 July 2014, to be reviewed in five years.